test_suites (table) Content
| 01JHTA4YPS8GT5ZV7N4YHPJV1T | SUT-003 | PRJ-001 | Functional Test Suite | To validate the functionality, reliability, and accuracy of the 10 APIs by executing functional test cases and ensuring alignment with defined requirements and API documentation. | arun-ramanan@netspective.in | 2024-12-15 | ["functional testing"] | ## Scope of Work The testing will cover the following key activities across 10 APIs: ### Functional Testing - Verify the accuracy of each API endpoint against defined test cases and the provided API documentation. - Validate input and response parameters, including headers and status codes. - Conduct boundary value analysis and test edge cases, such as handling empty requests, invalid inputs, and other unexpected scenarios. - Confirm the correctness and completeness of the data retrieved by APIs. - Ensure APIs effectively handle edge cases like invalid serial numbers or missing data. | |
| 01JHTA4YPY8ERD4TF1A7EWXEX8 | SUT-004 | PRJ-001 | Integrity Test Suite | To validate the seamless integration of APIs, ensuring proper database connectivity and the functionality of authentication retrieval mechanisms. | arun-ramanan@netspective.in | 2024-12-15 | ["integrity testing"] | ## Objective To validate the seamless integration of APIs, ensuring proper database connectivity and the functionality of authentication retrieval mechanisms. ## Scope This test plan focuses on verifying the following integration aspects: - **API Connectivity**: Ensuring smooth communication between APIs. - **Database Integration**: Validating the accuracy and functionality of database operations (e.g., data storage, retrieval, and updates). - **Authentication Retrievals**: Testing the reliability of API tracking mechanisms, especially for authentication retrieval processes. ## Test Environment - **Test Environment**: Test - **Database**: Connected to the live replication of the production database schema. - **API Version**: v1.0 - **Tool**: Playwright (Automation for API Endpoints) | |
| 01JHTA4YPZGHFEKCX6S2QCG1S0 | SUT-006 | PRJ-001 | Security Test Suite | This test suite conducting security tests on APIs to ensure alignment with the OWASP API Security Top 10 2023 guidelines. The goal is to identify vulnerabilities, mitigate risks, and establish robust security measures for API endpoints, ensuring data protection and regulatory compliance. | qa-lead@example.com | 2024-11-01 | ["security testing"] | ## Objectives - **Validate Security Controls**: Test APIs against the OWASP API Security Top 10 to ensure secure authentication, authorization, and data protection. - **Identify Vulnerabilities**: Detect and report critical vulnerabilities, including injection flaws, broken access controls, and security misconfigurations. - **Mitigate Risks**: Provide actionable remediation steps to address identified risks. ## Scope of Testing 1. **Authentication & Authorization**: Validate API keys, JWT tokens, role-based access controls, and protection against unauthorized access. 2. **Data Protection**: Ensure encryption in transit (TLS/HTTPS) and assess API responses for sensitive data exposure. 3. **Input Validation**: Test inputs for injection attacks (SQLi, XSS) and ensure strict validation of data formats. 4. **Error Handling**: Verify that error responses do not disclose sensitive internal information (e.g., stack traces). 5. **Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS)**: Assess configurations to allow only trusted domains. ## Approach ### Testing Methodology - **Black-box Testing**: Simulate external attacks without internal system knowledge. - **Gray-box Testing**: Test with partial knowledge of the system to identify hidden vulnerabilities. - **Dynamic Analysis**: Use tools like OWASP ZAP and Burp Suite for runtime vulnerability analysis. ### Tools & Resources - **Tools**: OWASP ZAP, Postman, Burp Suite, Wireshark, custom scripts. - **Standards**: OWASP API Security Top 10, OWASP Cheat Sheets. ## Entry & Exit Criteria ### Entry Criteria - API endpoints are documented and accessible. - Test environment is set up with appropriate user roles and credentials. - Necessary tools and resources are available for testing. ### Exit Criteria - All high and critical vulnerabilities are mitigated or formally accepted as risks. - APIs meet OWASP guidelines and organizational security standards. - Test execution report is delivered, and findings are addressed. ## Deliverables 1. **API Security Testing Report**: Categorized by severity (Critical, High, Medium, Low). 2. **Recommendations**: Actionable steps to remediate identified vulnerabilities. ## References - [OWASP API Security Top 10](https://owasp.org/www-project-api-security/) - [OWASP Cheat Sheet Series](https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/) - [Burp Suite Documentation](https://portswigger.net/burp) | |
| 01JHTA4YQ0A0PNMRTBPGNATMNA | SUT-002 | PRJ-001 | Compliance Test Suite | To validate that the system complies with the FHIR standards by testing its API endpoints and data exchange processes against the specifications defined in the Implementation Guide (IG). | qa-lead@example.com | 2024-11-01 | ["compliance testing"] | ## Test Execution Steps ### Analyze FHIR Implementation Guide (IG) Requirements - Review the IG to identify key compliance requirements, including resource profiles, extensions, and terminology bindings. ### Validate FHIR Resource Profiles - Verify that all FHIR resources conform to the structure and constraints specified in the IG. - Test for compliance with required, must-support, and optional elements. ### Verify Extensions and Modifications - Validate custom extensions and modifications to ensure they are defined and implemented according to the IG. ### Terminology Binding Validation - Confirm that codable concepts and value sets adhere to the terminology bindings specified in the IG. ### Check Conformance Statements - Validate system compliance with declared FHIR capabilities (e.g., search parameters, read, write, or operation support). ### Validate Interactions and APIs - Test API interactions (read, create, update, delete) to ensure they align with IG requirements. ### Test for Cardinality Rules - Verify adherence to cardinality rules (minimum and maximum occurrence constraints) specified in the IG. ### HTTP Status Code Validation - Validate API responses to ensure appropriate HTTP status codes are returned based on FHIR operations. ### Data Validation Against IG Examples - Compare FHIR resource instances against examples provided in the IG for accuracy and adherence. ## Decision Point - **If validation fails**: Proceed to "Defect Logging." - **If validation passes**: Proceed to "Documentation of Compliance." ## Defect Log in Jira & Xray - Log identified defects in Jira and link them to corresponding Xray test cases for traceability. ## Issue Fixes - Address non-compliance issues to ensure the API meets FHIR IG standards. ## Retesting & Regression Testing - Retest resolved issues to confirm compliance. - Conduct regression testing to verify no new issues were introduced. ## Test Report Generation - Generate a consolidated test report summarizing validation outcomes, including test success rates, defects, logs, and screenshots. ## Deliverables 1. **Test Report**: Summary of test execution, success rates, defects, and screenshots. 2. **Defect Management Records**: Complete traceability of logged defects from identification to resolution. | |
| 01JHTA4YQ3M1ZHM7ZK6FNJKCPX | SUT-005 | PRJ-001 | Performance Test Suite | To evaluate the performance, load handling, and scalability of the system. While single-user interactions are expected per device, performance benchmarks will be established to ensure the system operates efficiently under defined conditions. | qa-lead@example.com | 2024-11-01 | ["performance testing"] | ## Test Execution Steps ### 1. Define Performance Metrics Establish performance benchmarks to evaluate system behavior, including: - **Response Time**: Measure the time taken for API endpoints to respond under normal and peak load conditions. - **Throughput**: Assess the number of transactions or API requests handled per second. - **Error Rate**: Monitor the frequency of failed API requests during testing. - **Endurance Testing**: Evaluate the system's stability and reliability under prolonged usage. - **Resource Utilization**: Analyze CPU, memory, and network usage during testing. ### 2. Create Test Scenarios Design realistic scenarios for single-user interactions and simulated load testing to identify performance bottlenecks. - Include scenarios to validate system behavior during: - Normal operations. - Simulated load spikes (e.g., multiple device interactions over a short period). - Extended usage periods to test endurance. ### 3. Test Environment Setup - **Environment**: Replicate the production environment for accurate results. - **Tools**: Utilize the performance testing tool **JMeter** to simulate load and monitor metrics. ### 4. Execute Performance Tests - Perform baseline tests to measure system performance under single-user interactions. - Gradually increase the load to identify performance thresholds. - Conduct endurance tests to evaluate stability and resource utilization over time. ### 5. Analyze Results - Compare test results against performance benchmarks. - Identify deviations, bottlenecks, and potential areas for optimization. - Document findings for further investigation and resolution. ### 6. Recommendation Based on Findings - **If benchmarks are met**: Confirm system readiness and proceed to documentation. - **If benchmarks are not met**: Log identified issues, recommend optimizations, and perform retesting after adjustments. ## Documentation Document test results, including: - Response times across different loads. - Throughput and error rates. - Resource utilization trends. - Observations during endurance testing. ## Tools Utilized - **JMeter**: For performance and load testing. - **System Monitoring Tools**: For tracking CPU, memory, and network usage. ## Performance Metrics | **Metric** | **Definition** | | ------------------------ | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | | **Response Time** | Time taken by the API to respond to requests under various conditions. | | **Throughput** | Number of successful API transactions handled per second. | | **Error Rate** | Frequency of failed API requests under load. | | **Endurance Testing** | System reliability and stability under continuous load for extended durations. | | **Resource Utilization** | CPU, memory, and network usage trends during performance tests. | ## Deliverables - **Performance Benchmarks**: Baseline and target metrics for system evaluation. - **Performance Test Report**: Comprehensive summary of test results, observations, and recommendations. | |
| 01JHTA4YQ5FVFARFAW138KYVHN | SUT-001 | PRJ-001 | Compatibility Test Suite | To validate that the API system is compatible across a range of widely used browsers and operating system (OS) platforms, ensuring consistent functionality and user experience. | qa-lead@example.com | 2024-11-01 | ["Compatibility testing"] | ## Test Execution Steps ### 1. Browser Compatibility Testing - Test API functionality on the following widely used browsers: - **Chromium** - **Edge** - **Firefox** ### 2. OS Platform Compatibility Testing - Verify API compatibility on the following operating systems: - **Linux** - Validate on different distributions (e.g., Ubuntu, CentOS) to ensure broad compatibility. ### 3. Functional Validation Across Platforms - Execute the core functionality of API across all supported browsers and OS combinations, ensuring consistent performance: - **API Connectivity**: Validate the ability to establish a secure connection. - **UI Rendering**: Ensure UI elements render correctly across all browsers. - **Response Validation**: Check for accurate API responses and error handling. ## Test Case Execution - Use **Xray test cases** to document compatibility outcomes: - Record browser and OS configurations for traceability. - Capture and compare expected vs. actual results. ## Defect Logging for Incompatibilities - Log defects identified during compatibility testing in **Jira**, following the Defect Log Format (refer to Table 4): - Link defects with relevant Xray test cases for traceability. - Include screenshots of compatibility issues (e.g., UI rendering failures or functional discrepancies). ## Issue Fix and Retesting - **Resolve compatibility defects** to ensure seamless operation across all browsers and OS platforms. - Retest to confirm the resolution of defects. - Conduct **regression testing** to verify no new issues were introduced. ## Test Report Generation - Generate a consolidated report summarizing compatibility results, including: - Success rates across browsers and OS platforms. - Details of defects and their resolutions. - Logs and screenshots for documentation. ## Deliverables 1. **Defect Management**: - Detailed records of identified issues, their resolutions, and supporting evidence. 2. **Test Report**: - Summarized results with success rates, defects, and supporting logs/screenshots. |
Error We are sorry, but an error occurred while generating this page. You should contact the site's administrator.
Error in query number 6:
Parsing failed: SQLPage couldn't understand the SQL file. Please check for syntax errors:
SELECT 'text' AS component,
(SELECT CASE WHEN $current_page > 1 THEN '[Previous](?limit=' || $limit || '&offset=' || ($offset - $limit) || ')' ELSE ' END) || ' ' ||
⬆️
'(Page ' || $current_page || ' of ' || $total_pages || ') ' ||
Backtrace
sql parser error: Expected: END, found: ' ||
' at Line: 42, Column: 149"console/content/table/test_suites.auto.sql" contains a syntax error preventing SQLPage from parsing and preparing its SQL statements.You can hide error messages like this one from your users by setting the 'environment' configuration option to 'production'.